Lately I've been reading a lot of old comics. I don't know why, except that many of the newer comics just aren't doing it for me. I love superhero comics, but with Marvel and DC seemingly hellbent on destroying anything I could ever love about both of their universes, I've been heading back to the earlier days, and I've been enjoying myself a lot more than I have been with the cynicism and desperate attempts to be cool and modern that are being shat out by both companies right now. (With occasional exceptions, I admit, like the wonderful All Star Superman.)
Since I've always loved Marvel characters, I decided to go back to the beginning of the Marvel Age and sat down with The Essential Fantastic Four Vol. 1. It's always a trip to go back and see the goofiness, sexism, and "science hero" beginnings. Much has been made (and deservedly so) of the epic pairing of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, as well as the idea that Marvel Comics hit with an audience by presenting heroes for whom everything didn't come easily. (Although I'm not sure that's accurate--it reminds me of the idiot perception now that there's no drama for Superman because, supposedly, he's invincible--there's no question that Lee and Kirby's heroes here are flawed human beings who view their powers in different ways, and not always as a gift or a responsibility.) I hadn't read any old issues of The Fantastic Four in a very long time--this covers the first 20 issues--and it was as fun as I hoped it would be. And it's not that there wasn't angst--brother, there was tons of it--it's that the angst didn't consume all of the drama and action. You have Ben Grimm's constant anger and the villainy of Dr. Doom (and he is a great villain; every Doom story here is a classic), but what you don't have is the melancholy that comes from characters sitting around heavy-handedly pondering themselves.
What surprised me was the level of sexism here; at one point, Invisible Girl's hobbies are listed as "baking" and "reading movie star magazines." Sue Storm's major drama is that she's torn between Reed Richards and Prince Namor, to the point where she even has a hidden 8x10 of Namor behind a bookcase! You can tell Lee's written romance comics for years (and would up until, I believe, the early or mid 70s), but his attempts to marry that to the science fiction stories don't always work. They're not really jarring moments, but they do make me roll my eyes and laugh at something very dated. And Lee does try to balance it out by making sure that Sue is shown as useful and important to the team, despite what was apparently a large number of fan letters complaining to the contrary.
What I also loved was the adorable goofiness of it. Lee and Kirby were forging a relationship with a responsive audience as part of creating a brand identity, and if the comics themselves are anything to go by, it didn't take them long. This is the kind of thing comic book companies don't really do (or care about doing) anymore; I guess the idea that comics should be fun is out the window at the Big Two these days. I love that there's a story where the Fantastic Four go through their fan mail and take us on a tour of their facilities and demonstrate their hardware and powers. I'm not suggesting that this is something publishers should do now, I'm just saying acknowledging the fans and having fun with them goes a long way.
There are some classic stories in this volume (Ben Grimm as Blackbeard, Prince Namor attacking the surface world with the forces of Atlantis, the Super Skrull), and some that aren't really so classic (turning the Skrulls into cows, the Impossible Man), but I loved the whole thing.
I wish I could say the same for The Essential Astonishing Ant-Man Vol. 1, which ended up being torturous to read. Terrible villains, some really bad art (Don Heck, WTH?), awful writing, and rampant sexism (the Wasp just keeps on wondering why, why, why won't Ant-Man love her) made this one a downer. Somehow, it gets even worse when Ant-Man becomes Giant-Man. It just makes him a giant dick. Moving on...
I was surprised by how tedious I found The Essential Incredible Hulk Vol. 1. Stan Lee seems to have not known exactly who or what the Hulk was when he created him, and the volume really suffers from Lee and others desperately throwing story elements at the wall to see what sticks. First the Hulk only comes out at night, then he comes out whenever, then Bruce Banner is always the Hulk, then the Hulk is under the mind control of Rick Jones, then the Hulk can fly, then the flying is only leaping, then Banner can turn into the Hulk whenever he wants by dosing himself with gamma radiation, then the Hulk comes out whenever Banner's overstressed--but if the Hulk gets overstressed, he turns back into Banner. Will you guys just pick something and go with it?
There's also an inconsistency because of the art. The original run of The Incredible Hulk only lasted six issues before cancellation; then he became a recurring feature in Tales to Astonish (home of Ant-Man; what a joyless purchase that must have been). I'm actually not a fan of Jack Kirby's Hulk; he looks off to me. Steve Ditko's is actually worse, and there are a number of artists in here who also don't work. For my money, Bill Everett is the best of the Hulk artists in this volume. He really captures what the Hulk is all about to me.
The worst thing, though, is that Bruce Banner never registers too much as a character, and we're supposed to buy this love triangle he's in, where Betty Ross loves him, but Major Glenn Talbot, who is set on proving Banner is a communist traitor, loves Betty and wants her to see Banner for what he thinks he is. It's more romance comic melodrama, and it actually makes the book less readable.
The best of the four volumes I've read, hands down, is The Essential Amazing Spider-Man Vol. 1. I'd forgotten just how compelling and involving the early issues of Amazing Spider-Man were. Everything Stan Lee had been trying to do in other superhero comics just clicks perfectly here. Peter Parker stands in for overworked, harried, unpopular teenagers every where, and his fights with supervillains are only a part of his struggle. He's also struggling for money, struggling with his fear that his Aunt May can't get by without him, and struggling with his guilt over his Uncle Ben's murder. Peter Parker is a fully three-dimensional character, dealing with real problems that make his life a constant uphill battle. The real genius is to put Parker in situations where his spider powers can't really help him; swinging on webs and crawling up walls don't help his self-esteem, his problems with his boss, or his aunt's mortgage payments. He's juggling so much, and it's a perfect understanding of and metaphor for teenage stress.
Spidey has the best villains of any Marvel superhero, so every one is creative and menacing, even potentially lame ones like the Enforcers. This volume also has the epic story "The Sinister Six," in which six villains team up to get the best of Spidey, and every superhero in the Marvel Universe makes cameo appearances. Steve Ditko's art shines.
About Ditko: he was so the perfect artist for The Amazing Spider-Man. There's a back-up story in here from Amazing Spider-Man Annual #1 drawn by Jack Kirby, and Kirby's Spidey is too muscular, too cocksure, too beefy. Ditko's Spider-Man looks like a teenage kid; he's lithe and even scrawny, simply bluffing and sometimes blundering his way through battles with villains. Ditko's Amazing Spider-Man art handily beats, for me, Kirby's Fantastic Four.
Gosh, these were fun.
I'm moving on next to Thor and Iron Man. Can't wait to enjoy more old Marvels!
Sunday, February 07, 2010
Essential Marvels, Part 1
Posted by
SamuraiFrog
at
8:58 AM
Labels: Funnybooks
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)














7 comments:
Those "Essentials" volumes are awesome. I wish they weren't quite so expensive -- the Marvel ones I've bought were $16.99, where the equivalent DC titles (dubbed "Showcase") are $9.99.
Errr...clicked "submit" before I finished thinking...anyway, I've long been of the view that one big thing that keeps comics in something of a literary ghetto is simply the price point. Many comics are so expensive that it has to cut down on the numbers of people willing to take a flyer on something they've never read before. I'll cheerfully drop seven or eight bucks on a paperback novel by an unfamiliar author, but $29.99 on a graphic novel I'm unfamiliar with? Far less likely.
Some of the straight-to-DVD cartoon movies capture the joy of the old comics. I just watched "Planet Hulk," and it was great fun. Perhaps all the angst is edited out.
I love them. If they were around when I was a kid I would have ate them up. I loved those treasuries that reprinted the old stuff. The dollar comics that gave you 10 reprinted stories.
I gave my neice the first Spider-Man Essential Volume and she started reading with those and is so meticulous with her coloring of the pages. Pencil crayons and she only color's spidey and the bad guys. Its fascinating to read a story so highlighted and she is so good at it now that by issue six she could color comics full time.
All Superman was the greatest thing I have read in years. Frank Quietly can do no wrong as far as I am concerned and bash Morrison all you want but the man gives you maximum effort each time in a way that Bendis never does. Bendis just phones it in.
Kirby/Lee...Ditko/Lee, don't get better than those combinations. Iconic, everyone needs to learn at the feat of those masters first. Then you can move and do shit. Yeh I am looking right at you Rob Leifeld.
The early FF is essentially a monster comic, Hulk is a monster comic, X-men are monster comics. Spider-Man is a monster comic. Is there anything I love more than those Essential Marvel Monsters from the days of Atlas and before FF #1? Nope.
I really like what they are doing with Bruce Banner in the current comic. They have taken every possible twist on the Hulk that anyhone that could think of but asking the one question - "What if the monster is really Bruce and not the Hulk and it was the Hulk that protected us from Bruce Banner all these years." Now that twisted my noodle.
You should really try Kirby's 4th World Omnibus. I can honestly say that I have never had so much fun in comics than reading that.
It's a sad truth that the only comics I have are collections of old works, mostly Marvel Masterworks, though I also have a swamp Thing, a dark Knight, etc.
Jaquandor: Those are all reasons why I'm so happy with America's socialized library system. I can't buy any of those books, but I can check them out for three weeks. Inter-Library Loan is something I'm very grateful for.
Malora: Planet Hulk is the first Marvel-based one I've wanted to see, and then mostly because I did like the Planet Hulk story in the comics. (I heard in the movie they substitute the Silver Surfer with Beta Ray Bill, which is too awesome.) I love the DC movies, though.
Cal: I always liked treasuries, too. Part of how I discovered comics was that I checked out books from the library like Origins of Marvel Comics. I never thought of anyone coloring the Essential Marvel books; what a fab idea.
I have a lot of issues with Grant Morrison, mostly because I've been reading some of the recent Batman stuff and I'm about halfway through Final Crisis, and it's all terrible. Obviously, Morrison's not the problem (And neither is Geoff Johns, for that matter). They've got very talented writers who are trying to pass off a lot of convoluted nonsense because they're afraid to take all of this continuity whoring to its logical point and just end it all and start from scratch.
Papercrow: That's definitely on my to-read list. I've always wanted to delve into those. I'd like to read Kirby's OMAC, too.
Roger: When I first got into superhero comics, around the age of 8 (up until then I'd been mostly reading G.I. Joe and Disney comics), there was a sort of revolution happening with books like Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns and the resetting of the DC Universe. It made me immediately interested in comics history, and I really do love old works. I'm glad they've bothered to collect them.
Post a Comment