How is it that things can get even creepier?
In this chapter, we find out that Edward was born in 1901 and turned into a vampire in 1918 as he lay dying in a hospital of the Spanish flu that had already killed his parents. Somehow, it's supposed to be more honorable that Edward's "father," Carlisle, turns people into vampires only when they're dying. I don't know why, but this makes me feel creepy.
Also creepy: sparkling vampires. I don't know why, but it's just kind of creepy. It's also incredibly stupid and completely worthless. So, vampires can survive in the sunlight, but they don't like to venture out into it because they sparkle, and that attracts attention. That is the single dumbest thing you could ever attempt to add to the well-established literary vampire mythos. What is the point of it? Honestly, it only seems like it's there because, just over 300 pages in, Stephenie Meyer's got nowhere else to go. She's wasted so many giant adjectives so casually that she's got to find something bigger.
See, this is why I hate it when people casually use adjectives like phenomenal and epic, because it renders those words meaningless. Meyer's been repeatedly using words like godlike and archangel in describing the wonder of how panties-tingling Edward is that the only place she can think of to go is that his skin literally sparkles under the sun. And it's just so, so stupid. It's the mark of a bad writer, and Meyer is certainly that.
(Or, as a friend of mine put it, Stephenie Meyer is a gay man trapped in the body of a fat girl. Ouch. But since I've said many times that I hate Meyer and Anne Rice for turning vampires into imaginary gay best friends for lonely fat high school girls, I guess I can't judge.)
Bella keeps casually denigrating her father for the crimes of being interested and caring about her. It just bugs me. A lot.
But here are the two things that really annoy the living shit out of me. Oh, but first you need to know the basics of what happens: Edward drives Bella home, he comes inside and talks to her while she cooks dinner, then Bella makes her dad suspicious and goes up in her room and talks some more with Edward and then falls asleep laying next to him.
Okay, first annoyance: Edward already knows where everything is in Bella's house because he's already been inside. Every night. He lets himself in and stands there and watches her sleep every single night. So, all of this talk about how much he wants to kill her, and meanwhile he's been in her bedroom every night, just watching her sleep? That is fucking creepy.
Seriously, it's like a series of deal-breakers with this guy. Oh, he's hot. But he treats me like an intellectual inferior. He imposes on me to let him do everything so he feels masculine and superior (in this chapter, he even picks her up by her shoulders and sets her on the bed, she acknowledges, "like a toddler"). Then he tells me he's a monster who can't control his emotions, and that he's been desperate since I came to town to kill me and drink my blood. He acts out examples of how he can kill me, he follows me everywhere I go, and now he tells me that he breaks into my home and watches me sleep every night. She should be staking him right then and there.
Instead, Bella's flattered. Once again, she's too fucking stupid to live.
In fact, she's only horrified when he tells her that she talks in her sleep. Yeah, honey, that's the invasion of privacy.
Annoyance the second: this talk of how easily Edward can kill her keeps going on. Look, we get the fucking point already, and if Edward isn't going to just snap and rip her head off, you can stop talking about it now. The more this gets mentioned, the more idiotic Bella looks and the more of a pussy Edward makes himself. It's like that scene in The Princess Bride: "I'll most likely kill you in the morning." It's a punchline now. Let's move on, okay?
In a particularly sickening scene, they finally address the issue of sex (without saying the word, as though it's some kind of curse or something, fucking Mormons). Edward won't be having sex with Bella. Why? Because she's so fragile that he might lose control and kill her. I mean, if he's not thinking (or, Christ knows, talking) about not killing Bella every single moment, he'll just go ahead and do it.
Whatever. Keep talking about it, loudmouth. Edward is like one of those pathetic, mopey, emo boys who go around crying so that you'll know just how sensitive and tortured they are because they're desperate for attention.
Fuck, I hate these two assholes. And I hate Stephenie Meyer for writing this stupid book about herself and her tame fantasies as an allegory for being a loser in high school.
I especially hate her for encouraging far too many children to think that emotional abuse is love, that dry humping is a perfectly good substitute for sex, and that they should be terrified of sex. It's all over the internet; kids are fascinated by their bodies and by deep, overdramatic love, but they are absolutely terrified of the act of love itself. They talk like every single one of them is a target for molestation at the hands of an adult. They talk about sex as though it's evil. Why are kids today so fucking uptight? I don't think this book would have found near the audience it did if it didn't tap into the puritanical psyche kids have today when it comes to their bodies. They've gone from learning about safe sex to being afraid of having any.
The whole country's like this now: seemingly permissive, but uptight as all get out.
Anyway.
Here's the most telling moment of this chapter: when Edward says he's happy to be her prisoner, and then "his long hands formed manacles around my wrists." (Emphasis Meyer's.) That's it right there. Because that's what an emotionally distant abusive asshole does: makes you think his manipulations are somehow your fault.
Also there's the moment where he compares her to a baby seal being hunted by a killer whale, an even more pathetic metaphor than the last chapter's, where he compares her to being a lamb falling in love with a lion. Oh, and he compares her to wine again. Romantic.
Sunday, October 04, 2009
Twilight Summarized by a Smartass, Chapter 14
Posted by
SamuraiFrog
at
9:38 AM
Labels: Literary Life, Summarized by a Smartass
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)














5 comments:
At this moment, would you prefer to keep reading this book or watch Blade 3 on a loop for a long weekend?
Perhaps the most accurate literary review in history.
Your quote should be on the Twilight cover...
"I hate Meyer and Anne Rice for turning vampires into imaginary gay best friends for lonely fat high school girls"
MC: Blade 3 does at least have Jessica Biel... On the other hand, at least this is spaced out by a week.
Gilligan: We should call Little, Brown.
Frog, perhaps I can offer some perspective as a lifelong non-Mormon resident of Utah. Many of the things that are making you most crazy about this book are not Stephanie Meyer's fault, exactly; they are (possibly subconscious) reflections of the culture around her... specifically, the Utah Mormon culture, where people marry and have children very young, hold ridiculously inflated expectations of themselves and their neighbors, and often struggle with neuroses about sex and social status well into middle age. (I specify Utah Mormon because my understanding is that Mormons who live in other places are very different from those who live right here at the church's ground zero. It's hard to explain in any sort of concise way, but let's just say that people here tend to be very superficial and very fucked up about a great many things.) From what I know of the books, courtesy of my girlfriend who loves the damn things in spite of my efforts to make her see reason, the story is basically a 15-year-old Mormon girl's Mary Sue-style wet dream.
The sparkling vampire thing? Google the phrase "white and delightsome," which has long been Mormon shorthand for an ideal of physical perfection (and racist to boot, but that's another discussion).
Emotional abuse as love, dry humping instead of sex, and teaching kids to be terrified of sex? Nothing shocking to anyone who spent their teen years here.
The whole thing about Edward struggling to control himself and keep from hurting Bella? Directly out of what the church teaches young people, i.e., that young men carry a power and responsibility (their sexual capability) that can be immensely harmful if it's used incorrectly, and that young women are to be protected and cherished like some kind of fragile knick-knack. In fact, this story element, more than any other, is in my experience a young Mormon woman's perfect romantic fantasy.
I could go on... the Native American werewolves are stand-ins for the Lamanites, who in the Book of Mormon were the wicked bad guys who fought the white and delightsome good guys. The vampire "family" is very like the Mormon ideal of family. And on and on.
I'm not defending Meyer. A good writer is informed by their background and has the skills to make something enlightening or poignant or at least entertaining out of it, and from everything I've heard and seen (I did see the Twilight movie, gack), she totally fails to rise to that challenge. But I understand where her ideas come from, and to someone who grew up here, all these unsettling, weird, and just plain stupid ideas are very familiar stuff.
Thanks for leaving that; it does put the novel into a whole new perspective. I knew Meyer was a Mormon, but I didn't realize just how much it permeated the whole enterprise. Her mentality makes more sense to me now. I'll still look down on it, but I understand where she's coming from.
Post a Comment